Covid-19: Securing the Present and the Future

This is the most serious crisis since World War II. Politicians must step up; voters must allow them to.

Politicians are elected because they campaign in poetry, but voters don’t always account for the fact that elected representatives must govern in prose. That chasm between the promise and the delivery becomes more dangerous at times like these. Just like wartime generals have to be different from peacetime generals, crisis-time politicians have to step up from being normal-time politicians.

In times of the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19), we need our leaders to assume new responsibilities. They must first educate themselves about the crisis by listening to, and learning from, experts. Then, they must communicate what they know to us, without creating undue alarm. They must be honest enough to admit their fallibility. They need to be inspirational enough to command our cooperation. They need to lobby for their own constituencies to get a share of central and shared resources. They need to transparently prioritise these resources for those who may need them most. They have to be frontline responders.

Simultaneously, they also have to safeguard the future. History has shown us that in crises, a centralised, and unaccountable leadership can emerge. Unless carefully managed, this can lead to a breakdown of trust between the government and the public. Other politicians must then evolve into system leaders. They must safeguard democracy itself; to protect against a creeping authoritarianism that is hard to push back when normalcy returns. To do so, they must demonstrate the relevance of empowered local government.

Is it even possible for our politicians to step up to the plate? Will we allow them to, even if they wanted to try? Can voters respect the difficult situation their representatives find themselves in? Can we give them space to think ahead, even as they try to contain the immediate calamity?

Benjamin Disraeli once said, “The world is weary of statesmen whom democracy has degraded into politicians”.

One reason for such a deterioration is that voters expect too much from representatives. Strangely, we barely hold them accountable for their primary duty as lawmakers. We don’t always appreciate that good laws make for good societies, and that our representatives have the constitutional duty to help craft those good laws. Instead, most people expect their elected representatives to be at their beck and call, to provide patronage and brokerage, to help their communities through small but urgent hardships. It is a 24/7, largely thankless job for most politicians.

I saw this personally in my husband, Nandan Nilekani’s, unsuccessful Lok Sabha campaign. He would imagine big possibilities for the country, which would also make people’s lives much better. Most voters, though, asked about things that affected them in the here and now — whether a community hall could be built, or the speed bumps could be removed outside their gates or if the stray dogs would be taken care of.

Inevitably, voters feel frustrated when all these requests cannot be met. Sometimes, politicians give up on this impossible quest and ride roughshod over their constituencies. It is not too surprising that we have politicians across all parties with criminal records, who keep getting re-elected, even from prison. Many have their troops of men to fulfil some of the basic wishes of the voters, keep things in check, and appear to be locally effective.

Of course, we still have several wonderful politicians. They work as hard as they possibly can to serve their people, help pass good laws, represent the interests of their constituents at every opportunity and also reach out and communicate with their voters.

We must help their tribe increase, especially now. American theologian and author James Freeman Clarke observed: “The difference between a politician and a statesman is that a politician thinks about the next election while the statesman thinks about the next generation.”

There are wonderful instances from India’s democratic history where India’s statesmen have done just that. Former Prime Minister (PM) Jawaharlal Nehru’s government built the nation’s core infrastructure. PV Narasimha Rao’s government opened up the economy for next-generation entrepreneurs. Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s government filled critical gaps in the education system, and developed the nation’s roads and telecommunication networks for today’s digital or migrant citizen. Their eyes were pinned to the horizon.

The pandemic and the economic downturn that accompanies it offer a creative opportunity for politicians to become statesmen. As poet Muhammad Iqbal wrote, “Nations are born in the hearts of poets – they prosper and die in the hands of politicians.” If our politicians focus on the word “prosper”, and if voters allow politicians to do what statesmen must, perhaps this unprecedented crisis would serve to strengthen our democracy for future generations, and not to undermine it.

All over the world, people are looking to their leaders to guide them through the double whammy they are facing: The Covid-19 pandemic and the unfolding economic crisis. This has been probably the most challenging time for politicians since the World War II. They need our empathy and our forbearance.

The Unexplored Potential of Learning Beyond Schooling

The COVID-19 crisis should push us to re-imagine education in radical ways that we’ll be thankful for.

At six, in grade 1, my daughter returned from school in a chirpy mood. “What did you study today?” I asked. She was puzzled. “I didn’t study anything,” she replied, “but I learnt a lot.”

Education in the time of Covid-19 offers a similar and radical opportunity: to let children learn effectively without being burdened by having to study unimaginatively.

The nation’s education system is in turmoil. While it has been disrupted before, due to wars, strikes, or floods, never has it had to stop all physical proximity. Governments, teachers, parents and students are all asking the same questions with differing levels of anxiety: What should we do now and how long will this go on?
Education analysts have opined for decades that the current schooling systems don’t work as well as they should. Education can be understood as of instrumental or intrinsic value. The education infrastructure is simply not creating the kind of learner, the kind of citizen, or the kind of workforce that society needs or individuals may want. There is a growing consensus that we mainly need to teach children “how” to learn, so that they can continually educate themselves. With the world in rapid flux due to emerging technologies, climate change and now this pandemic, everyone needs the agency to acquire new knowledge and skills on the go.

Through this crisis, there have been intense consultations between the Centre and states, between states and civil society, and among communities of schools, educators and parents. What needs to be done immediately to sustain children’s learning? What must be done if schools remain shut for a long time?
At Ekstep Foundation, we undertook a lightning survey to understand what parents, teachers and students are feeling. There is apprehension all around. For students, there is uncertainty and fear, especially at the higher grades, in this exam season. Parents are equally frustrated and cannot shoulder the additional task of teaching their children. They don’t know what or how to teach. They are also worried about letting their children spend too much time online. Lower-income parents have the opposite concerns, of a lack of access to digital devices. Teachers want to quickly find ways to stem a loss of learning among their students. Interestingly, they themselves feel inadequate in teaching their children at home. The role of parents cannot be easily infused with the authority of a teacher. It is a herculean challenge to keep young minds engaged for long. But we have no choice other than to figure out how to do exactly that. This will need a new social contract between the education system, including teachers, and the community, including parents. Roles and responsibilities will have to shift quickly.

Amazing innovations have already come about. The internet is full of options for parents to play and learn with their kids at home; to go beyond curriculum-based thinking. Many content platforms are curating content and offering it for free. Elite schools have created virtual classes and parent conferences. The government is working to increase the utility of its digital platforms such as Diksha, which bridge the physical world of the textbook with a virtual platform through a simple QR code. This allows children continued access to compatible syllabus and teacher-created content. Already, parents and teachers are adapting to this innovation, with millions of downloads and sessions on Diksha. More is on the anvil from the government.

We can choose to look at this phase as an opportunity. It is inevitable that we will need digital technology to re-imagine learning beyond schooling. Even if it is only to inspire people to do more things physically. Now is the time to let go of the technophobia, and understand the power of open digital public goods. Now is the time to make sure that children without access to digital devices are not left behind. Even if this means the state having to ensure a digital device and connectivity for each family. No doubt there are dangers involved in letting children go online unsupervised. So, now is also the time to set new normative rules and behaviours around what, how and how much children should go online to learn.

There are other creative opportunities too. Children’s ability to learn is infinite when they are engaged. During a lockdown, children could learn physics through helping in the kitchen, learn literature through storytelling or more conversations in their own languages, and understand the circular economy through changed consumption patterns in households. None of these are easy tasks, and parents across the board may reject this burden. Yet, uncommon times call for unconventional wisdom. Can we use this time to re-imagine learning itself, so that post-virus, we can implement schooling with better learning? Can we finally listen to those who have been advocating a different approach for decades? Can we restore individual agency to learn at pace, can we involve parents and communities more structurally, and can we restore the primacy of the caring teacher? Can we reinstate the primacy of critical thinking and of upholding universal human values?

This is not mere idealism. The current crisis gives a chance to transform education across the country. Let’s open this window of opportunity together, so that every child can truly feel that she did not study but she learnt a lot.

Women’s Day: Rohini Nilekani says her 20th century-born grandmother was modern in best sense of the term

Born Godavari Ketkar, at the turn of the 20th century, she spent her childhood in the sylvan surroundings of the Gwalior palace, as her father was an ambassador to the maharaja’s court. She spoke of going to the little local school in deer carriages. The beautiful young Goda came to Belgaum at the age of 12 as the second wife of my barrister grandfather Babasaheb Soman. He had no interest in material things or maharajas. He and his blind brother Bhausaheb were known as the RamLakshman of the neighbourhood. He spent his time in social work and in getting his clients to settle out of court.

When he took off for Champaran in 1917, in answer to Gandhiji’s first clarion call for volunteers, Godavari, by then simply called Atyabai, managed not just her pregnancy but also the large house, with many mouths to feed. My grandfather got more and more involved with the freedom movement, and Atya’s home became the gathering place for visitors and dignitaries of the Indian National Congress. Her precious maternal possessions were hawked off one by one. She was no meek sufferer and must have expressed her opinion. But the cause was greater than them all. Swarajya and deshbhakti were infused in all hearts and she faced her personal challenges head on. She was sent ceremoniously to prison by the British along with her husband. She won prizes for spinning the finest yarn and hand-spun her own nine-yard saris. Remarkably, she also stood resolutely by her husband’s decision to undergo prayopavesha or gentle fasting unto death, when he suffered from incurable paralysis.

Much after Independence, when her son, Vice Admiral Bhaskar Soman, became the second chief of naval staff, Atya had a brief return to luxury in the Lutyens’ quarters. But her mind and heart had turned to austerity. And she was unafraid of making unconventional choices.

She spent most of the next quarter century living in a rented one-room tenement in the temple town of Alandi, the Samadhi Sthala of the 12th century Bhakti saint Dnyaneshwar. She took in a Varkari student, Sakharam, who, in turn, helped her with chores like fetching water. The Vitthal temple, the bhajans and Dnyaneshwari shlokas became her world.

Her occasional visits to our home are among the most prized memories of my childhood. Atya was a magical storyteller, imprinting the life stories of Dnyaneshwar, Tukaram and Namdeo in our minds. She was the most fabulous cook and, as I write this, I can almost taste her sweet gulpoli and her spicy pithla. The sugar and the spice she loved quite defined her personality too. She could drip honey when her grandchildren needed comforting. But she was not above throwing bitter phrases at errant autowallahs or others who came in her path.

Atya was my inspiration, and still lives on for me. As a woman, she was modern in the best sense of the word. She was imperfect but a seeker, she was feisty and fun but put duty above personal pleasure. She participated fully in life even as she withdrew into her inner self. Her Vitthal was a compassionate and forgiving God, her true companion and, ultimately, her home. She was a woman of her time, but perhaps a woman for all time, too.

सवाल, पक्षियों की आखिर अहमियत क्या है?

चेतावनी… हाल ही में जारी स्टेट ऑफ इंडिया बर्ड्स 2020 रिपोर्ट का डेटा बेहद चौंकाने वाला है

बसंत का मौसम है। मौसम पंछियों वाला। देश में भले आप कहीं भी रहते हों, घने जंगल से लेकर बियाबान रेगिस्तान या फिर गली-मोहल्लों वाले किसी शहर में। संभावना है कि सुबह आपकी नींद पक्षियों के चहचहाने से खुलती होगी। फिर भले वह कौआ हो या कोयल, पक्षी देश में हर जगह मिल जाएंगे। दुनियाभर में गिने-चुने मुल्क हैं जहां हमारे देश जैसी मुख्तलिफ पक्षियों की आबादी है। बर्ड वॉचर अब तक 867 प्रजातियां देखने की बात दर्ज कर चुके हैं। जिनमें स्थानीय भी हैं और प्रवासी भी।

सच तो ये है कि दशकों तक हमारे उपमहाद्वीप ने साइबेरिया जैसी मीलों दूर जगहों से आए प्रवासी पक्षियों का स्वागत किया है। हम्पी के पास लकुंड़ी गांव में हजारों साल पुराने चालुक्य मंदिर की बाहरी दीवारों पर प्रवासी पक्षियों की आकृतियां उकेरी हुई हंै। जिसमें हंस, सारस और फ्लेमिंगो तक शामिल हैं।
देखा जाए तो हमारी संस्कृति में पक्षी बेहद लोकप्रिय हैं। हमें यह याद दिलाने तक की जरूरत नहीं कि देवी देवताओं के वाहन कौन से पक्षी हैं या फिर हमारे राजघरानों के प्रतीकों में किन पक्षियों के चिह्न थे। संगीत हो या फिर कला हर एक में पक्षी मौजूद हैं। हर बच्चे को पंछियों की कहानियां याद हैं, चतुर कौए की कहानी तो याद ही होगी, हिंदुस्तान की कई कहानियों में पक्षी हैं। हमारे पास 3000 साल पहले यजुर्वेद में दर्ज एशियाई कोयल की परजीवी आदतों का डेटा है। पक्षी हमारे पक्के साथी हैं, शारीरिक तौर पर भी और सांस्कृतिक रूप में भी।

हालांकि हाल ही में जारी हुए स्टेट ऑफ इंडिया बर्ड्स 2020 रिपोर्ट का डेटा बेहद चौंकाने वाला है। यह देश में पक्षियों के बहुतायत में होने के चलन, संरक्षण स्थिति का अपनी तरह का पहला विस्तृत आकलन है। भारत में पक्षियों के डेटा को इक्ट्‌ठा करने एनसीएफ, एनसीबीएस और ए ट्री जैसे दसियों संगठन साथ आए हैं। उन्होंने 15,500 आम लोगों के 1 करोड़ ऑब्जरवेशन पर बहुत भरोसा जताया है। जिन्होंने आसानी से इस्तेमाल होने वाले ‘ई बर्ड’ प्लेटफॉर्म पर अपना डेटा रिकॉर्ड किया हैै। डेटा के मुताबिक 867 प्रजातियों में से 101 को संरक्षण की बेहद ज्यादा, 319 को सामान्य और 442 को कम जरूरत है। 261 प्रजातियों के लिए लंबे वक्त के ट्रेंड समझे गए जिसमें से 52 प्रतिशत जो कि आधे से ज्यादा हैं, उनकी संख्या साल 2000 के बाद से घटी है।
जबकि इनमें से 22 प्रतिशत की संख्या काफी ज्यादा घटी है। 146 प्रजातियों के लिए सालाना ट्रेंड पढ़े गए और उनमें से 80 प्रतिशत की संख्या घट रही है और 50 प्रतिशत की संख्या खतरनाक स्तर पर है। इस स्थिति पर तुरंत ध्यान देने की आवश्यकता है।

इस रिपोर्ट के आने से पहले तक हमें अपने पक्षियों के जीवन का भाग्य नहीं पता था। हम चुनिंदा प्रजातियों के बारे में जानते थे, जैसे मोर, जो कि देश का खूबसूरत राष्ट्रीय पक्षी है। जिसकी स्थिति काफी अच्छी है और संख्या ठीक-ठाक बढ़ रही है। और गौरेया जिसके बारे में पर्यावरणविदों को लगा था कि वह खत्म हो रही है। बस इसलिए क्योंकि शहरी इलाकों में उनकी मौजूदगी कम हो रही थी, जबकि असल में उनकी संख्या स्थिर है। इस रिपोर्ट की बदौलत अब मालूम हुआ कि प्रवासी पक्षी जैसे कि गोल्डन प्लोवर, शिकार पक्षी जैसे कि गिद्ध और हैबिटेट स्पेशलिस्ट जैसे कि फॉरेस्ट वैगटेल काफी खतरे में हैं। पर इनकी चिंता हम क्यों करें? इन पक्षियों की आखिर अहमियत ही क्या है?

पक्षी हमारे इकोसिस्टम में अहम भूमिका रखते हैं। वह दूसरी प्रजातियों के लिए परागणकारी हैं, बीज फैलाने वाले, मैला ढोने वाले और दूसरे जीवों के लिए भोजन भी हैं। पक्षी स्थानीय अर्थव्यवस्था का हिस्सा बन सकते हैं, क्योंकि कई लोग उन्हें देखना पसंद करते हैं। देश में बर्ड वॉचर्स की बढ़ती संख्या ने इकोटूरिज्म को बढ़ावा दिया है।

सच तो यह है कि मानव स्वास्थ्य पक्षियों की भलाई से काफी नजदीक से जुड़ा है। और उनकी संख्या घटना खतरे की चेतावनी है। अंग्रेजी का एक रूपक है, ‘केनारी इन द कोल माइन’। यानी कोयले की खदान में केनारी चिड़िया। पुराने जमाने में खदान में जाते वक्त मजदूर पिंजरे में केनारी चिड़िया साथ ले जाते थे। यदि खदान में मीथेन या कार्बन डाईऑक्साइड का स्तर ज्यादा होता था तो इंसानों के लिए वह गैस खतरनाक स्तर पर पहुंचे इससे पहले ही केनारी चिड़िया मर जाती थी। और मजदूर खदान से सुरक्षित बाहर निकल आते थे। स्टेट ऑफ इंडिया बर्ड्स रिपोर्ट 2020 इस केनारी चिड़िया की तरह ही हमें आगाह कर सकती है। अपने पक्षियों को बचाने के लिए हम क्या कर सकते हैं? जरूरत है हम देखें, समझें और उनकी रक्षा करें। मैं कई दशकों से पक्षी प्रेमी हूं, पक्षी मुझे बेइंतहा खुशी देते हैं। एक तरीके से उनका कर्ज चुकाने को मैं अपने बगीचे का एक हिस्सा अनछुआ रहने देती हूं ताकि पक्षी वहां आकर अपना घोंसला बना सकें। हमारे आसपास मुनिया, बुलबल और सनबर्ड के कई परिवार फल-फूल रहे होते हैं। मेरी कोशिश होती है कि फल और फूलों वाले कई पौधे लगाऊं। मैं बगीचे के अलग-अलग कोनों में पक्षियों के लिए पानी रखती हूं। अलग-अलग ऊंचाई पर ताकि छोटे-बड़े हर तरह के पक्षी उसे पी सकें। भारत में कई समुदाय पक्षियों के संरक्षण के लिए बहुत कुछ कर रहे हैं। कई बार अपनी आजीविका की कीमत पर भी। कर्नाटक के कोकरेबैल्लूर में गांववालों और दो तरह के पक्षियों की प्रजातियों स्पॉट बिल्ड पेलिकन और पेंटेड स्टॉर्क के बीच एक खास संबंध है। नगालैंड के पांगती में गांववालों ने पिछले दिनों अमूर फालकन को न मारने की कसम खाई है। ये पक्षी बड़ी संख्या में उस इलाके से गुजरते हैं।

हाल ही में सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पहल करते हए राजस्थान की सरकार को लुप्तप्राय सारंग पक्षी को बचाने का निर्देश दिया हैै। सारंग वह पक्षी है जो मोर चुनते वक्त हमारा राष्ट्रीय पक्षी बनने की दौड़ में था। ऐसे उदाहरण हर जगह हैं, जैसे पक्षी हर तरफ हैं। पक्षी हमारी आंखों को खूबसूरती से भर देते हैं और कानों को चहचहाहट से। वह हमारे दिलों को शांति और सुकून देते हैं। अब बतौर समाज हमें सोचना होगा कि भारत की पक्षियों की अद्भुत विविधता को स्वस्थ रखने के लिए कर क्या सकते हैं। उनके लिए भी और खुद के लिए भी।

आदिवासियों का कर्ज है हम सब पर, बंग दंपती उसका हिस्सा चुका रहे हैं

इस नए दशक की शुरुआत में खुशकिस्मती से मुझे एक प्राचीन इलाके में जाने का मौका मिला जो अपनी हालिया परेशानी से उबर रहा है। विदर्भ का गढ़चिरौली, भारत के सबसे पिछड़े आदिवासी जिलों में से एक है। वहां गोंंड आदिवासियों के वनक्षेत्र में देश के 8 करोड़ आदिवासियों की तरह ही गोंड लोगों का सामना भी अस्तित्व से जुड़े सवालों से होता है।

आधुनिक अतिक्रमणकारी दुनिया के साथ उन्हें कितना आत्मसात करना चाहिए? वे अपनी पुरातन सांस्कृतिक प्रथाओं को कैसे जिंदा रख सकते हैं, जो जंगल से कसकर जुड़ी हैं? वह पारंपरिक ज्ञान को आने वाली पीढ़ियों में कैसे संरक्षित कर सकते हैं, जिनकी महत्वाकांक्षाएं तेजी से बदल रही हैं?

34 सालों से इन समुदायों के साथ जीने और काम करनेवाले डॉ अभय और राणी बंग ने भी इन सवालों को महसूस किया है। वह गांधी जी और विनोबा भावे से गहरे प्रभावित हैं। अमेरिका से डॉक्टरी की पढ़ाई करनेवाले इन दो लोगों ने स्वास्थ्य जैसी बुनियादी ज़रूरतों पर ध्यान केंद्रित किया है।

साल दर साल जो देखा, सुना, पढ़ा उसकी बदौलत हेल्थ प्रैक्टिस के ऐसे मॉडल तैयार किए हैं जो समुदाय की ज़रूरतों से वास्ता रखते हैं। नतीजे शानदार हैं, शिशु मृत्युदर कम हुई है और बाकी बीमारियों का बोझ ऐसे स्तर पर पहुंचा चुका है जहां वह देशभर में ही नहीं बल्कि बाकी देशों खासकर अफ्रीका में मॉडल बन चुका है।
संगठन का नाम ‘सर्च’ है, सोसायटी फॉर एजुकेशन, एक्शन एंड रिसर्च इन कम्युनिटी हेल्थ। और 55 एकड़ में बना उनका खूबसूरत कैम्पस कहलाता है ‘शोधग्राम’। अलग-अलग क्षेत्रों के युवा प्रोफेशनल को जिसने अपने यहां आकर रहने, काम करने, समाज की असाध्य परेशानियों को हल करने के लिए अनुसंधान और प्रयोग करने को प्रोत्साहित किया।

टीम की लगन और प्रतिबद्धता अनुकरणीय है। मैं जब वहां थी तो एक सर्जरी कैम्प चल रहा था, जिसके लिए सर्जन दूर-दूर से श्रमदान करने आए थे। डॉक्टर्स ने मुझे बताया कि वह श्रमदान उनके लिए नई स्फूर्ति भरने वाला था, संतोषजनक अनुभव जिसे वह बार-बार दोहराना चाहेंगे। मरीजों का कहना था कि वह यहां इसलिए आए हैं क्योंकि यहां उन्होंने बेहतरीन मेडिकल केयर के साथ दया और गरिमा का अनुभव किया है।

जिसने मुझे सबसे ज्यादा प्रभावित किया वह ये कि बंग दंपती ने अंध विचारधारा में अपने दृष्टिकोण को कठोर नहीं किया। उस वक्त जब देश में अत्यधिक ध्रुवीकरण हो रहा है, तब इस खुले विचारों वाले संगठन का मिलना सुखद है।

सर्च ने अपनी वैज्ञानिक जिज्ञासा और साक्ष्य आधारित दृष्टिकोण के साथ-साथ मानवतावादी धारणा को बरकरार रखा है। डॉ राणी अपने दिल की ज्यादा सुनती हैं और डॉ अभय दिमाग से चलते हैं। और उन दोनों से जब गलती होती है तो वह उसे मानने से डरते या झिझकते नहीं हैं।

डॉ अभय कहते हैं बतौर वैज्ञानिक वह सिकल सेल के मामलों पर रिसर्च करना चाहते थे। पर उन्हें समझ में आया कि यह आदिवासी समुदाय की मूलभूत समस्या नहीं है। निमोनिया, शिशु मृत्यु और नशे की लत पर काम ज्यादा जरूरी था। जिस अनुसंधान की शुरुआत आदिवासियों के लिए हुई थी अब वह उनके जीवन से जुड़ गया था।

यहां ट्रेनिंग ले चुकी अंजना बाई गर्व से कहती है कि उनकी देखरेख में पिछले कई सालों में एक भी बच्चे की मौत नहीं हुई है। वह मुझे एक नवजात बच्चे के घर भी ले गईं। छोटे बदलावों से यह संभव हो पाया है। नई माएं पहले बच्चों को बिना कपड़ों के रखतीं थीं जिससे उन्हें हाईपोथर्मिया का खतरा रहता था।

आज परिवार और हेल्थ वर्कर बच्चों की नियमित देखभाल करते हैं। टीम यह सुनिश्चित करने के लिए कड़ी मेहनत करती है कि वह अपनी धारणाएं आदिवासियों पर न थोपें। सरकार के साथ मिलकर चलाए जा रहे प्रोग्राम मुक्तिपथ के जरिए शराब और तम्बाकू पर खर्च को काफी कम कर दिया गया है। जिस पर सरकारी स्कीमों से भी ज्यादा खर्च होता था।

कुछ ही सालों पहले तक यह नक्सलवाद का गढ़ था। जब स्थानीय आदिवासियों को नक्सलियों और पुलिस के बीच जारी शिकंजे के चलते मुखबिरों की खोज में फंसाया जाता था। आसपास के जंगलों में अभी भी कई क्रांतिकारी छिपे हैं। उनकी विचारधारा के लिए सरकार के हस्तक्षेप से ज्यादा प्रतिस्पर्धा बंग की निरंतर क्रांति है।

वह क्रांति जो गोंड आदिवासियों के उत्थान और समृद्धि के लिए निस्वार्थ तौर पर प्रतिबद्ध है। आज वह गढ़चिरौली जहां पहले सुरक्षित पहुंचना भी असंभव था, धीरे-धीरे देश की मुख्य धारा से जुड़ रहा है। अब कॉलेज, दुकान और अस्पताल हैं, अच्छी सड़क और कनेक्टिविटी भी है। लेकिन क्या आदिवासी हमारी तरह आधुनिक बनेंगे? या हमारे पास उनसे सीखने की सहूलियत होगी?

यह सवाल अनुत्तरित है। गढ़चिरौली से लौटते हम ले आए हैं खूब सारी शुद्ध हवा अपने भीतर भरकर। हम शुकरान हैं महुआ, तेंदू और सागौन के उन पेड़ों के, उन गोंड आदिवासियों के जो इन प्राचीन जंगलों के खिदमतगार रहे हैं। इन आदिवासियों का हमारे देश पर बड़ा कर्ज है। और बंग दंपति उसका एक छोटा सा हिस्सा चुकाने की कोशिश सालों से कर रहे हैं।

The Joy of Staying With the Young

In the world of children’s books, 16 years is a long time, which is how old Pratham Books turned on January 1, 2020. Co-founded and funded by Rohini Nilekani, Pratham Books is a non-profit publisher focused on introducing children to the joy of reading.
Nilekani has written 11 books for Pratham Books so far, out of which five are bundled into a series. She hopes to write the sixth one in the series soon. Nilekani retired as the Chairperson of Pratham Books in 2014. She is happy that the non-profit publishing house has more than taken off and has realised its potential. Also, thanks to its digital platform called ‘Storyweaver’, her books have been translated into dozens of languages globally. With a clear not-for-profit goal, the books have been put in the Creative Commons so she gets no remuneration. But then, she says, “I get immense joy when I hear of children reading and liking my books, which is quite invaluable.” Nilekani has signed a contract with Juggernaut and has the manuscript approved for a new Level 1 English book for children of 3-6 years. Nilekani hopes the book will be out this year. She has clear ground rules for her writing: “You have to be careful not to be overly moralistic.” Tanush, her three-year-old grandson, is inescapably her inspiration today.

संविधान का वादा पूरा करने का अवसर

अधिकार… हर व्यक्ति को सामाजिक, आर्थिक, राजनीतिक स्वतंत्रता और न्याय की सुरक्षा ससम्मान मिले

मैं कई बार सरकार, समाज और बाजार की निरंतरता के बारे में बात करती हूं। एक सफल समाज के लिए क्याें इन तीनों का सामंजस्य बनाकर साथ काम करना जरूरी है। आदर्श तौर पर सरकार या राज्य को अपने पास अत्यधिक राज-सत्ता नहीं रखना चाहिए। बाजार को कानून और सार्वजनिक संसाधनों के उपयोग से जुड़े नियमों का अनादर नहीं करना चाहिए। न ही समाज के सतर्क लोगों को कानून अपने हाथ में लेना चाहिए। इसके लिए जागरुकता और सभी नागरिकों की भागीदारी बेहद जरूरी है। आखिरकार हम नागरिक पहले हैं, हमारी पहली पहचान सरकार की प्रजा या फिर बाजार के उपभोक्ता की नहीं है। हमें देखना होगा कि एक नागरिक की तरह क्या हम अच्छा समाज तैयार करने में मदद कर रहे हैं?
समाज और सरकार, बाजार और सरकार और तो और समाज और बाजार के कई हित एक-दूसरे से जुड़े हैं। इस लेख के जरिए हम समाज और बाजार के बीच हितों के सामंजस्य की पड़ताल करेंगे, जिसकी शुरुआत कानून कायम करने से होती है। हम सभी चाहते हैं और यह सभी के लिए जरूरी भी है कि कानून व्यवस्था को बरकरार रखा जाए। यदि 300 साल पहले कानूनी व्यवस्था के जरिए लिमिटेड लाइबिलिटी कंपनी नहीं बनाई जाती तो वास्तव में बाजार या फिर जिसे हम आधुनिक कॉर्पोरेशन के रूप में जानते हैं, वह कभी अस्तित्व में ही नहीं आता। इस व्यवस्था ने सदियों इनोवेशन को पनपने का मौका दिया और असफलताओं के असर को भी कम किया है। जहां इनोवेशन है वहां असफलताएं भी होती हैं। इसलिए रूल ऑफ लॉ के मुताबिक कंपनियां बिना बर्बाद हुए, असफल भी हो सकती हैं। अपने हितों की सुरक्षा के लिए कानून बनाए रखने में कॉर्पोरेशन की बड़ी हिस्सेदारी है। कॉन्ट्रैक्ट्स लागू करवाना, प्रॉपर्टी की सुरक्षा और स्वस्थ प्रतिस्पर्धा बनाए रखना बेहद जरूरी है, वरना वह काम चला ही नहीं सकते। इससेे भी आगे उनके लिए जरूरी है कि बतौर समाज कानून व्यवस्था को स्वीकार किया जाए। क्योंकि कोई भी व्यवसाय सामाजिक स्थिरता के दायरे के बाहर सफल नहीं हो सकता।

इसलिए सामाजिक संस्थाएं और व्यवसाय के बीच अनुमान से कहीं ज्यादा समानताएं हैं। हां, कुछ मामलों में सामाजिक संस्थानों की स्थिति व्यवसाय से जुड़े हितों के विरोध में होती है, जब वह हित असलियत में गलत तरीके से लागू किए जाएं। उदाहरण के लिए जैसे पानी, जमीन या फिर पर्यावरण से जुड़े मुद्दे जैसे प्रदूषण के मामले में सामाजिक संस्थाएं और व्यवसाय एक-दूसरे के आमने-सामने खड़े होते हैं। पर दोनोें के लिए जो जरूरी चिंता होती है वह है सरकारी नीतियों को नियंत्रण में रखना। दुनियाभर में सरकारी ताकतें एकजुट होती रहती हैं। व्यवसाय और सामाजिक संस्थाओं दोनों के लिए फायदेमंद होगा यदि वह यह सुनिश्चित करें कि राज्य अपनी शक्ति का दुरुपयोग न कर पाएं। कॉर्पोरेशन को अपना व्यवसाय चलाने के लिए सरकार की अनिश्चितताओं का सामना करना पड़ता है। यदि समाज और बाजार के एकत्रीकरण को समझकर उसके लिए काम किया जाए तो वह सरकार पर पाबंदियां लगाने में मदद करता है। उदाहरण के लिए एनजीओ और बिजनेस कॉर्पोरेशन एक साथ या फिर अलग-अलग सरकार से लचर कानून व्यवस्था को लेकर अपील कर सकते हैं। सीएसआर का पालन न करने पर उसे अपराध घोषित करने के प्रपोजल से समाज और बाजार दोनों पर प्रतिकूल प्रभाव पड़ सकता था। दोनों ने इसके खिलाफ आवाज उठाई और इस प्रपोजल को वापस ले लिया गया। हम सभी को अच्छे कानूनों की जरूरत है, साथ ही जरूरत है स्वतंत्र, निष्पक्ष और कुशल न्यायपालिका की ताकि कानूनों की संवैधानिकता का पता लगाया जा सके। हम सभी को न्याय प्रणाली तक समान पहुंच की आवश्यकता है। हमें प्रभावी सार्वजनिक संस्थानों की भी जरूरत है जो कानून व्यवस्था बनाए रखने में मददगार हों। यही तरीका होगा बाजार के सशक्तीकरण और नागरिकों के अधिकारों को मजबूत करने का।
समाज का हित कानून में ही है, लेकिन उस तक पहुंच के मसले जटिल हैं, खासकर गरीबों के लिए। समाज का प्रतिनिधित्व करने वाले सिविल सोसायटी ऑर्गेनाइजेशन (सीएसओ) ज्यादातर अधिकारों और आजादियों के जुनून और प्रतिबद्धता के बलबूते चलते हैं। अलग-थलग छूटे लोगों के लिए बेहतर संस्थान तैयार करने और कैम्पेन चलाने से कई बार वह निजी जोखिम लेकर सरकार और कॉर्पोरेशन के खिलाफ भी चले जाते हैं। सिविल सोसायटी को यह सीखना और प्रसारित करना होगा कि इस तरह के काम से बिजनेस को लंबे समय में बेहतर मुनाफा होगा। क्योंकि बाजार यह काम नहीं कर सकता। कानून व्यवस्था बनाए रखने से जुड़े सामाजिक संस्थानों के काम से कॉर्पोरेशन को फायदा जरूर मिलता है। लेकिन वह खुद राजनीति से जुड़े काम नहीं कर सकते। वरना उन्हें सरकार की नाराजगी झेलनी पड़ सकती है।

लेकिन वह जो कर रहे हैं उससे कहीं ज्यादा तो कर ही सकते हैं। जिन सिविल सोसायटी इंस्टीट्यूशन्स पर वह भरोसा करते हैं और जिनके साथ उनके बेहतर रिश्ते हैं, उन्हें प्रोजेक्ट बेस्ड फंडिंग की जगह कोर इंस्टीट्यूशनल सपोर्ट देना चाहिए। यदि वह इतना भर कर देते हैं तो यह अधिकारों और बहिष्करण के मुद्दों पर सामाजिक संस्थानों की क्षमता को मजबूत करेगा। सरकार और सिविल सोसायटी, बिजनेस और सिविल सोसायटी या फिर सरकार और बिजनेस के हमेशा आमने-सामने होने की जरूरत नहीं है। वह अनिवार्य तौर पर एक-दूसरे के विरुद्ध नहीं हो सकते। समाज तभी सफल होता है जब वह बाकी तीन से अपनी तनातनी कम कर लेता है और समाधान तैयार करने लगता है। यही वक्त है जब बिजनेस और सामाजिक संस्थाएं एक दूसरे को ज्यादा जाने, भरोसा रखें और साथ में बढ़े।

गणतंत्र की 70 वीं सालगिरह तो आ गई पर हमारा संविधान में किया वादा अभी पूरा नहीं हुआ। इस नए दशक की शुरुआत पर अच्छा मौका है कि हम एक बार फिर खुद को संवैधानिक मूल्यों से जोड़ें। तो क्यों न हम ध्यान रखें उस लक्ष्य और उद्देश्य को। कि, देश के हर व्यक्ति को सामाजिक, आर्थिक और राजनीतिक स्वतंत्रता और न्याय की सुरक्षा ससम्मान मिले।
(यह लेखक के अपने विचार हैं।)

Corporates Should Support the Rule of Law

The time has come to align self-interest and public interest in support of the rule of law and constitutional values.

I have often talked about the continuum of sarkaar, samaaj, and bazaar, and why, for a successful society, these three sectors must work together in a fine balance.

Ideally, sarkaar, or the state, should not grab too much power, bazaar, or the market, should not flout the rule of law or appropriate public resources, and vigilantes from the samaaj, or civil society, should not take the law into their own hands.
This requires awareness and active participation from all citizens. After all, we are citizens first; our primary identity is not as a subject of the state or as a consumer for the market. As citizens, how do we then help build a good society?

The bazaar’s interest in the rule of law

There are many interests between samaaj and sarkaar; bazaar and sarkaar; as well as between samaaj and bazaar. For the purpose of this article, we will examine the congruence of interest between samaaj (society) and bazaar (markets). And it starts with the rule of law.

“No business can thrive without social stability outside its gates.”

We all want and need the rule of law to be upheld. In fact the bazaar—or at least the modern corporation as we know it—would not exist if the rule of law had not created the limited liability company 300 years ago. This allowed innovation to flourish over the centuries, and also provided for the absorption of failure, because wherever there is innovation, there is failure. It is because of the rule of law that companies can fail without going under themselves; and therefore, for their own sake, corporations have a great stake in upholding it. They need the enforceability of contracts, protection of property, availability of fair competition, and so on, otherwise they simply cannot function. But even beyond this, they need the law to be upheld by society at large, because no business can thrive without social stability outside its gates.

Civil society and business therefore have more in common than either believe. Sure, in some cases, civil society has to position itself against business interests, when those interests are being deployed unfairly on the ground. For instance, in the case of public goods like water and land commons, or with environmental issues like pollution and contamination, civil society and business knock up against each other. But they also have a common concern—to keep the sarkaar in check.

Keeping the sarkaar in check

State power worldwide tends to accumulate, and it is to the advantage of both business and civil society, to make sure that the state does not abuse its own power.

Many corporations have been subject to the vagaries of state power while running their businesses; excessive discretionary power also adversely affects the climate in which businesses operate. If the alignment of samaaj and bazaar is understood and worked on, it helps restrain the state.

For example, civil society institutions and business corporations might together, or separately, appeal to the state on poorly framed laws. In the recent proposal to criminalise non-compliance of CSR, both samaaj and bazaar would have been adversely affected.

Both successfully voiced strong reservations against it, and it was rolled back.

“We all need good laws, and an independent, impartial, and efficient judiciary to verify the constitutionality of those laws.”

We all need good laws, and an independent, impartial, and efficient judiciary to verify the constitutionality of those laws. We all require equal access to the justice system. We also need effective public institutions that help uphold the rule of law. It is the only way to both empower the bazaar and uphold the rights of the country’s citizens.

The samaaj has an interest in the rule of law as well, as it is critical for addressing access issues, especially for the poor. Civil society organisations (CSOs) representing samaaj are often driven by passion and a commitment to rights and freedoms.

Sometimes, at great personal risk, they go up against the power of the state and corporations, to create campaigns, build institutions, and push for more agency for people who are left out. Civil society must however learn to communicate better the long term benefits of such work to business.

Because, the bazaar itself cannot do this work. Though they benefit indirectly, corporations cannot support or implement politically sensitive programs, and risk the fallout of such action. It would make them vulnerable to all sorts of state action.

But they can certainly do more than what they’re doing at the moment.

With the civil society institutions that they trust and already have a relationship with, they can, and should, give core institutional support to continue work beyond project-based funding. Even if they do just this, it strengthens civil society capacity to take on issues of rights and exclusions that are adjacent to their work on service delivery.

It’s time to take big bets

Swami Vivekananda said, “Take risks in your life. If you win, you can lead, if you lose, you can guide.”

Indian philanthropy doesn’t take enough risk. However, it cannot achieve its potential without risk-taking. It’s good to keep honouring service delivery improvements, but it’s time to look at our society as a whole, and for the philanthropic sector to step up and get into more important areas such as access to justice. And the congruent interest of samaaj and bazaar is exactly why.

From a recent Boston Consulting Group report—‘Total Societal Impact- A New Lens for Strategy’, it’s clear that corporations which align with samaaj’s ideals will be better off in the long run. There is now exhaustive research that shows that the non-financial side of business is linked to its financial side, and that companies that do well when it comes to ESG—environmental, social, and governance issues—also consistently show better results on their bottom line.

Can we—as corporations and philanthropists—pledge that we will no longer do only incremental work, but will try something transformational? The time has come to align self-interest and the public interest in support of the rule of law and constitutional values.

The common within uncommon ground

It doesn’t have to be the state versus civil society, or business versus civil society, or the state versus business. They are not neccessarily antithetical to each other.

Society is successful when it reduces the friction for the three to co-create solutions. And it’s important for all the three sectors to recognise that—to discover the common within the uncommon ground.

It is an especially opportune time for business and civil society to act more creatively from their own, unrecognised common ground. Poised at a new decade, we can together ensure that this country’s solemn promise to itself—to secure liberty and justice, social, economic, and political—for all its citizens, will be met, and met in abundance.

Why I Love To Read

My childhood was spent between the pages of hundreds of books. My mother had to force me away from the book I was clutching so that I could do my daily chores, such as help set the table. Thank God for all those authors and illustrators who carried me off into a world of make-believe, letting me immerse myself into the lives of strange and wonderful characters with whom I could talk, whose stories I could extend, and who would always be my secret friends. In those faraway days, when I was growing up in the 1960s, it was not easy to find good books. I was fortunate to live in a big city called Bombay. Luckily, we used to have small, well-stocked circulating libraries nearby.

Enid Blyton was the hot favourite for girls when I was little, and I read every single book of hers I could find. By the age of six, I was reading the Malory Towers series, about the adventures of children in a boarding school. Before that I had read the Noddy books, and various comic books, like the Akbar- Birbal series. Remember, we grew up without TV, the Internet or mobile phones. But we did not know what the future would bring, and we were happy in our present. It was so much fun to walk down to the library, choose our books, pay the few paise of reading charges from the pocket money that our mother gave us, and come home to read, read and read. If we were lucky, we were allowed to buy a crunchy snack to add to the enjoyment. It was sheer bliss.
The habit of reading never goes away. It stays with you all your life. Books are always going to be your companions, your mentors, your entertainers and your teachers. The wisdom and humour of the whole world is at your fingertips when you can access good books.

Even when you are sick, a good book is like medicine to help you get better. When you cannot get away for a vacation, a travel book can transport you to your desired destination from an armchair.

When it seems like the world is against you, or nobody likes you, or when you feel you are failing, there are always books and stories to remind you that others have been in the same place as you are now, and things will get better.
Today the world has gone digital. You can read books on your phone, on your computer or on a shared digital device. Young people are now called digital citizens because they grew up with the Internet and smartphones and more. But a book is a book whether you read it on crisp new paper, old, crinkled sheets or on a screen. Hopefully, many young people will have both screen and paper to experience many ways of reading and sharing. Yes, books can be enjoyed alone, but can also be shared, must be talked about with others, such as in a book club.

There is an explosion of authors and titles for young children today. I almost wish I were a little girl again, to be able to read all the exciting books I see when I go to book shops.

In a way, I am experiencing that joy all over again. I am now blessed with a little grandson, who started enjoying books at the age of eight months. He needs to have several books read to him before he will fall asleep!

Many little children are not so lucky. Many of them have no access to books. Knowing this, I became Founder-Chairperson of Pratham Books in 2004. We set out to publish attractive, affordable books for children in many languages, so that all of India’s children could share the same joy of reading that I had discovered. Till date, Pratham Books has created hundreds of books, and millions of children have read them, as printed books or as free books online. I hope you have read some too, and liked them. Nothing would be more satisfying than to hear that!

For every child, I have a wish. I hope you find great books that you will love to read again and again. I hope you meet characters who become your special companions. I hope you will always find good teachers and friends who share your love of reading.

IDR | Developing our digital commons

As donors and changemakers, we have an obligation to ensure that the knowledge and resources we create are truly open and accessible to all, independent of our organisation or mission.

– By Gautam John & Supriya Sankaran

Where would you begin if you wanted to help everyone share in the sum of all knowledge? What ‘models’ would allow for the most inclusivity? Encyclopædia Britannica, first published in 1770, had a mission of compiling the sum total of human knowledge. In 2012, they announced the end of their print edition. Did they achieve their mission?

In 2001, an upstart called Wikipedia was founded with a similar mission as Encyclopædia Britannica; however, it adopted a radically different approach. Rather than an encyclopedia created by experts, Wikipedia believed that open content on open platforms would attract a community interested in improving the quality and quantity of knowledge over time. Today, Wikipedia has around six million articles in English alone and is available in more than 300 languages.

Remarking on how Wikipedia’s approach is interesting, but would not work for Britannica, the managing director said, “My job is to create more awareness of our very different approaches to publishing in the public mind. They’re a chisel, we’re a drill, and you need to have the correct tool for the job.” The final print edition of Encyclopædia Britannica had around half a million topics covered.

Will an open platform model like Wikipedia’s work in India?

Will an open platform work in areas other than those whose mandate it is to compile and share knowledge? Pratham Books is a case in point. A tiny publisher with a mission of ensuring ‘a book in every child’s hand’, Pratham Books was able to experiment in ways most other publishers did not. Open content, and open platforms and communities enabled them to pivot, and target both variety and quantity of books for children all over the world. They began releasing their books under open licenses and after years of experimentation, built an open platform called StoryWeaver, which today has nearly 17,000 stories in more than 200 languages.

But it wasn’t just books that flourished. Individuals and organisations, both known and unknown to them, created multiple derivative works ranging from iPad and iPhone applications, to creating versions of their books for the print-impaired such as DAISY and Braille books, as well as audiobooks.

Intention alone, or sharing resources only when approached, does not lead to true openness and spread.

These are just two of many journeys that build a compelling case for all of us, as philanthropies and civil society organisations, to create open resources and digital public goods.

But what does that really mean and involve?

The philosophy and intention are not unfamiliar to us in civil society. Many of us intend for the resources—the data, code, content, and processes—we create to be shared widely and used by all. Many leaders emphatically state their desire for their ideas to grow and for people to adopt them. But we all know that such intention alone, or sharing resources only when approached, does not lead to true openness and spread.

What does it take to be truly open?

Openness must be anchored in intent and to truly create open resources and digital public goods, we must proactively practice openness of three kinds.

1. Technical openness: Resources must be available in an easy, timely, and user-friendly manner online, adhering to a set of applicable open standards.

2. Legal openness: Resources must be legally licensed under an ‘open’ license for all manners of use and adaptation, whether commercial or not, subject only, at most, to the requirement to attribute or share alike.

3. Financial openness: Resources must be accessible for free.

All three are critical to ensure that the resources we create are truly open and accessible to all, independent of the organisation or mission.

As changemakers and philanthropies working for public benefit, such an approach is obligatory. What we create must be designed as public goods. Given that the sourcing, creation, and validation of code, content, and data is time- and resource-intensive, opening up publicly-funded resources is critical—it will advance equity and enable collaboration.

Opening educational resources such as training materials, processes for running a local campaign, software, codes or applications can enable your resources to be localised, translated, and adapted far beyond their original purpose, intended reach, and individual imaginations. When KaBOOM!, a US-based organisation with the vision of ensuring every child has a great space to play, open-sourced its model of building playgrounds and created toolkits for communities to build their own playgrounds, it resulted in local communities building ten playgrounds for each one that KaBOOM! built. This resulted in more than 17,000 playgrounds that have impacted the lives of more than 10 million American children, and the activation of 1.5 million volunteers across the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Opening data and code, in particular, can unlock scarce resources, avoid duplication of effort, and generate savings.

Opening data and code, in particular, can unlock scarce resources, avoid duplication of effort, and generate savings. For example, legal researchers take 8-24 months to source and clean datasets and a single project can cost anywhere between INR 20 and 50 lakhs; this is because it needs to be collected, collated, and then rationalised. The same is likely to be true in the fields of data-driven journalism and research in science, governance, and the environment. As seen from the example of the Human Genome Project, opening data and codes can enable publicly funded projects to go beyond their single use to be further built upon by others. Such openness increases the return on investment in each initiative, and the field as a whole.

Related article: Civil society and the burden of data

Recognising this, foundations such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have adopted an ‘open access policy’ as a non-negotiable term for all peer-reviewed, published research, partly or wholly funded by them. The policy also requires that the data underlying the published research results should be accessible and open immediately. This means that not only the published research but the process of research is also available to the public to make the best use of it. The underlying rationale is that, free, immediate, and unrestricted access to research will accelerate innovation, helping to reduce global inequity and empower the world’s poorest people to transform their own lives.” In various jurisdictions, and in the field of science in particular, the gold standard for the credibility of any research and data-driven effort is to make the data, ideas, and research open.

Opening resources is not without risks of misappropriation or misuse. Measures can and should be taken to mitigate these by placing appropriate disclaimers or limited warranties, documenting the process of creation, and enabling users to understand how the resource can be correctly used. But while weighing these risks, it is equally critical to consider the risk of not opening your resources, in terms of limiting their potential and spread beyond their own context and as seeds for new efforts and ideas.

In many ways, the bazaar (or market) has led in its contributions to the digital commons—with more than 4,500 employees actively sharing codes on shared open platforms such as GitHubMicrosoft may be the largest contributor to open codes. Sarkaar (the government) too has started doing its part with the Open Data Portal and Open Source Code Repository. It is high time samaaj (society), the philanthropic and civil society ecosystem, did the same.

We can each reach our highest potential only if we adopt ‘open’ as the default position.

All change begins with setting the intention, and we can take an ‘Open Resources Pledge’ today to put forth our commitment to creating open resources. It is key to remember that there is no requirement to open every resource or dataset, and we can start simply by opening up parts of resources one by one. We can leverage various guides to enable us to choose the datasets, apply an open license, make the data available online on our own website, or a third party website (DataHub, GitHub, Ekstep), or application programme interfaces (APIs), and make them discoverable.

We can each reach our highest potential only if we adopt ‘open’ as the default position. We have the power to create public resources and digital public goods of a new kind, where not only does their use not deplete the commons, but it enriches it.

India Development Review